What do you think about NFT royalties—are they fair or a bit overhyped?

[Manon]

NFT royalties have been a hot topic lately, with creators earning a percentage from secondary sales. Some argue it’s a fair way to reward artists, while others feel it’s a cash grab. What’s your take on how royalties should be handled in the NFT space?

 

[Aesthatic girl]

NFT royalties offer creators a revolutionary way to earn ongoing income, ensuring they benefit from future sales. While the concept is innovative and fair for artists, its success depends on balanced implementation that doesn’t deter buyers, making it a valuable but sometimes misunderstood aspect of the NFT ecosystem.

 

[SUNSHINE]

The fairness of NFT royalties lies in their ability to empower creators with sustainable revenue streams. They bring transparency and accountability to digital ownership, adding value for artists and collectors alike, though their effectiveness depends on platform adoption and the overall market sentiment.

 

[Snowy]

NFT royalties represent a significant step in rewarding creators for their contributions, aligning incentives in the digital art world. While they are innovative, their perceived hype often comes from the evolving adoption curve and the challenges of consistent enforcement across decentralized platforms.

 

[peterjohn]

NFT royalties fairly empower creators with ongoing income, but their sustainability depends on market acceptance and balanced fee structures.