Chicki Akiba
Well-known member
From a tech-savvy perspective, it's all about finding a balance that supports both creators and traders without stifling the market's growth. I think optional royalties could be a good compromise. Let the creator set the royalty percentage, but allow buyers and sellers to opt in or out at the time of the transaction. That way, if traders want to flip without paying extra fees, they can, but creators still have the option to earn passive income if buyers choose to support them.
Caps could work too, but I’d argue they'd need to be dynamic, potentially based on factors like how many times an NFT has changed hands or how much value it’s gained. We don’t want a rigid structure that harms the flexibility of the ecosystem.
In my personal NFT transactions, I usually factor in the royalties when deciding whether to purchase or sell. I like supporting creators, but I also understand the frustration with constantly paying royalties. This hybrid model could be the best of both worlds, creating a more sustainable and adaptable marketplace.
Caps could work too, but I’d argue they'd need to be dynamic, potentially based on factors like how many times an NFT has changed hands or how much value it’s gained. We don’t want a rigid structure that harms the flexibility of the ecosystem.
In my personal NFT transactions, I usually factor in the royalties when deciding whether to purchase or sell. I like supporting creators, but I also understand the frustration with constantly paying royalties. This hybrid model could be the best of both worlds, creating a more sustainable and adaptable marketplace.