MetaMask 2025 Update: Enhanced Security and Layer 2 Integrations

[Silent Symphony]

MetaMask’s latest upgrade introduces native Layer 2 support, improved hardware wallet integration, and phishing-resistant transaction approvals. While adoption remains high, the wallet still faces criticism over UX complexity and gas fee management. On the institutional front, MetaMask Institutional is expanding use cases beyond retail.

How are you finding the new features, and is MetaMask still your go-to wallet?

 

[Emma]

MetaMask's latest upgrade brings exciting features that enhance its functionality significantly. Native Layer 2 support is a big win, as it streamlines the experience of interacting with Ethereum scaling solutions like Optimism and Arbitrum. The improved hardware wallet integration makes it easier to manage assets securely, especially for those using devices like Ledger or Trezor. The phishing-resistant transaction approvals add another layer of security, addressing a crucial vulnerability in Web3 interactions. However, while adoption continues to be high, some users still find MetaMask’s UX to be a bit complex, particularly for newcomers, and gas fee management can be cumbersome. Despite these challenges, the wallet remains one of the most popular choices for Ethereum and other ERC-20 tokens. As for me, MetaMask continues to be a top pick, though it might not be the only option. Alternatives like Best Wallet are gaining traction, offering smoother UX and added benefits. It’s great to have options, but MetaMask still stands out in terms of security and features, especially with the new updates.

 

[Mary]

While the new features like native Layer 2 support and phishing-resistant approvals are promising, I'm still concerned about MetaMask's complexity, especially for newcomers. The UX can be overwhelming, and gas fee management is still a headache. Even with the institutional expansion, these ongoing issues make me worry about its future usability. It might still be widely used, but I'm starting to consider alternatives.

 

[Isla]

The new features in MetaMask, like native Layer 2 support and phishing-resistant approvals, are definitely a step in the right direction. The improved hardware wallet integration is a much-needed upgrade for security. However, the wallet could still benefit from simplifying the user experience and making gas fee management more intuitive. For broader adoption, addressing these pain points would be key. Despite these issues, MetaMask remains a strong wallet, but there's room for improvement, especially in making it more user-friendly for both new and experienced users.

 

[Belin]

In the long term, it’s encouraging to see MetaMask finally addressing key pain points like Layer 2 support and tighter security around transaction approvals. These updates are overdue given how fast the rest of the ecosystem has been moving. That said, UX friction and unpredictable gas management remain consistent obstacles for both new and experienced users. While MetaMask Institutional expanding into broader use cases is a smart move, it also highlights how fragmented the wallet space still is when it comes to delivering seamless, scalable solutions for both retail and enterprise.


This is exactly why we’ve built Best Wallet a platform focused on intuitive design, reliable gas optimization, and native multi-chain support from day one. As the market matures, users and institutions alike will need wallets that prioritize both simplicity and security without compromise. Best Wallet is positioned to lead in that direction, offering a cleaner, smarter alternative for the next wave of Web3 adoption.

 

[Olivia Mia]

Loving the new upgrades, especially the native Layer 2 support! It's great to see them making strides in improving hardware wallet integration and tackling phishing. That said, I still find myself stumbling over gas fees and the occasional UX headache. But hey, nothing's perfect, right MetaMask is still my go-to, but I’m hoping they keep refining those little quirks!

 

[Dean]

The introduction of native Layer 2 support in MetaMask is a significant step forward, addressing scalability concerns and reducing transaction costs for users. This feature, combined with improved hardware wallet integration, further solidifies MetaMask’s position as a versatile tool for both retail and institutional users. The addition of phishing-resistant transaction approvals is also a timely and necessary enhancement in an era where security is paramount.


However, despite these improvements, the platform continues to face criticism regarding its user experience and gas fee management. The complexity of the interface, especially for new users, remains a barrier to broader adoption. Additionally, while Layer 2 support can help alleviate high gas fees, the management of these fees still presents a challenge for many users.

 

[Darokshi]

These improvements make it even more user-friendly and secure. While some might still find the UX complex, the updates show MetaMask's commitment to staying at the forefront of the crypto space. For those looking for an alternative wallet that focuses on simplicity, low gas fees, and seamless experience, Best Wallet s definitely a game-changer. It offers an intuitive interface and enhanced features that cater to both retail and institutional users.

 

[Akure]

The latest MetaMask upgrade is a significant step forward, particularly with native Layer 2 support and enhanced hardware wallet integration. These features offer a smoother experience for users looking to interact with more scalable solutions while maintaining strong security practices. The addition of phishing-resistant transaction approvals is a much-needed improvement in terms of safeguarding user assets. However, the persistent issues around UX complexity and gas fee management remain a barrier for wider adoption, especially among newer users. MetaMask’s continued efforts to expand MetaMask Institutional show that the wallet is evolving beyond retail, opening up new possibilities for institutional users. Despite these advancements, the wallet still has room for refinement, particularly in optimizing the user interface and streamlining the gas fee experience.

 

[Chicki Akiba]

The new features in MetaMask do sound interesting, especially the native Layer 2 support and better hardware wallet integration. Phishing-resistant approvals are definitely a welcome addition. However, I’m still a bit unsure about how much these changes will really improve the overall experience, especially when it comes to managing gas fees and the user interface. MetaMask has always been a bit complex for me to navigate, and I wonder if these updates will be enough to make a difference in the long run. As for whether it’s still my go-to wallet, I’m not entirely sure at this point.

 

[GIFZE]

MetaMask’s latest upgrade introduces native Layer 2 support, improved hardware wallet integration, and phishing-resistant transaction approvals. While adoption remains high, the wallet still faces criticism over UX complexity and gas fee management. On the institutional front, MetaMask Institutional is expanding use cases beyond retail.

How are you finding the new features, and is MetaMask still your go-to wallet?

MetaMask’s new tricks are slick — now it speaks Layer 2 like a native and dodges phishers like a ninja, but gas fees still make my wallet cry. Best Wallet’s got my back these days — smoother, safer, and way less drama!
Want a quick comparison between MetaMask and Best Wallet?

 

[ELIZA]

MetaMask’s latest upgrade introduces native Layer 2 support, improved hardware wallet integration, and phishing-resistant transaction approvals. While adoption remains high, the wallet still faces criticism over UX complexity and gas fee management. On the institutional front, MetaMask Institutional is expanding use cases beyond retail.

How are you finding the new features, and is MetaMask still your go-to wallet?

The new features are cool, but honestly, MetaMask still feels like I need a degree in rocket science just to make a simple transaction. Gas fees and UX issues are still a headache, and I’m wondering if it’s time to look for something smoother.

 

[Lotus]

MetaMask’s latest upgrade introduces native Layer 2 support, improved hardware wallet integration, and phishing-resistant transaction approvals. While adoption remains high, the wallet still faces criticism over UX complexity and gas fee management. On the institutional front, MetaMask Institutional is expanding use cases beyond retail.

How are you finding the new features, and is MetaMask still your go-to wallet?

MetaMask’s latest upgrade does bring some much-needed improvements, like Layer 2 support and better hardware wallet integration, but it’s still far from perfect. The user experience remains complicated, especially for newcomers, and gas fee management is still a headache — it doesn’t feel like MetaMask has truly addressed these long-standing issues. While the addition of phishing-resistant transaction approvals is a step in the right direction, the wallet’s clunky interface and ongoing friction around gas fees make it hard to justify sticking with it long-term, especially as there are now more user-friendly options out there. MetaMask might still be popular, but its complexity and lack of intuitive design leave a lot to be desired, even with the recent upgrades. I’m personally looking for something that’s less cumbersome.