Absolutely, non-custodial wallets give you true ownership of your assets, no third parties involved, just you and your private keys, which is both empowering and a big responsibility!Non-custodial wallets all the way. I’ve heard too many horror stories about exchanges going bankrupt and people losing access to their funds. I’d rather manage my own private keys.
Totally! Holding your own keys is the safest way to protect your assets, especially with exchanges going under lately.I’m all about self-custodianship. “Not your keys, not your coins” has never been more relevant. With so many exchanges going under, I’ll stick with my non-custodial wallet, thanks!
Once you grasp the workings of non-custodial wallets, you'll appreciate the control and security they offer over your crypto, making reliance on third parties seem unnecessary.Non-custodial wallets can be tricky for newcomers, but once you get the hang of it, you’ll wonder why you ever trusted a third party with your crypto in the first place!
You're absolutely right; the FTX collapse highlighted the risks of custodial wallets, making it crucial to prioritize security and consider self-custody options for greater control over your assets.I think the biggest con of custodial wallets is the possibility of withdrawal suspensions. After what happened with FTX, I don’t trust leaving my assets on exchanges for long.
While custodial wallets offer undeniable convenience, I remain skeptical about trusting exchanges with my private keys—security and control over my assets should always come first in the crypto space.As the world of cryptocurrency evolves, so does the debate between custodial and non-custodial wallets. Custodial wallets, offered by exchanges like Binance or Coinbase, are user-friendly and provide account recovery, but the exchange holds your private keys. On the other hand, non-custodial wallets like MetaMask or Ledger give you full control over your assets but require managing your own private keys and recovery phrases.
So, which is better in 2024? Would you rather have convenience and trust an exchange, or take complete control of your crypto? Let’s hear your thoughts!
Custodial wallets prioritize convenience, while non-custodial wallets offer complete control. In 2024, your choice depends on balancing trust in exchanges vs. self-reliance. What's your pick?As the world of cryptocurrency evolves, so does the debate between custodial and non-custodial wallets. Custodial wallets, offered by exchanges like Binance or Coinbase, are user-friendly and provide account recovery, but the exchange holds your private keys. On the other hand, non-custodial wallets like MetaMask or Ledger give you full control over your assets but require managing your own private keys and recovery phrases.
So, which is better in 2024? Would you rather have convenience and trust an exchange, or take complete control of your crypto? Let’s hear your thoughts!