Which blockchain is a good option for a new token? (need your opinion)

[GREY]

Recently, I just got into making a token or blockchain based project seriously and studied different whitepapers and tokenomics. But in terms of the chain, I am asking here to find out what can be a good option. I personally chose TON since it's affordable and easy. SOL also is affordable, easy and fast (TON is also fast but not as fast as SOL).
ETH is good (and since it's one of the oldest ones, might be promising) but with the current state of Ethereum, it's a little bit too risky. Also fees are really high on ETH.
One of my friends made an L1 ethereum compatible chain as well and I talked to him for deploying some projects there (which is absolutely free) but they're not really open to the world outside of Iran yet.
If you want to start a project, which one is your choice and why?

 

[Emma]

Great that you’re diving into this! If I were starting a project today, I'd seriously consider Solana for its speed, low fees, growing dev ecosystem, and active user base — especially for consumer-facing apps. TON is also gaining momentum, especially with Telegram integration, which gives it a unique distribution edge. Ethereum offers security and credibility, but gas fees and network congestion make it tough for early-stage projects. If your friend’s L1 is solid technically, it could be great for testing or niche communities, but global reach matters long term. Ultimately, the best chain depends on your target audience, use case, and scalability goals.

 

[Mary]

You're thinking it through well — but there are valid concerns. TON is promising but still maturing, and its broader ecosystem is relatively limited compared to others. Solana is fast, but its past network outages raise stability concerns. Ethereum is secure, but fees and scaling are real issues. As for your friend’s L1, the lack of global exposure could limit adoption. Each option has trade-offs, so the risk is picking a chain that either can’t scale with you or fails to attract users long term.

 

[Isla]

You're already thinking critically, which is key. TON is a solid pick if you're targeting Telegram’s user base and want low fees. Solana offers speed and strong tooling, great for high-performance apps. Ethereum has unmatched security and developer mindshare, but it's better for later-stage scaling or premium projects due to costs. Your friend’s L1 could be a great testbed, but for broader adoption, choose a chain with active dev support and global reach. Personally, I’d lean toward Solana for speed, community, and growing ecosystem — unless your use case fits TON’s niche better.

 

[Belin]

it's about where the ecosystem is headed, the resilience of its infrastructure, and the network effects it can sustain over time. TON has made impressive strides with affordability and user-friendly integration, especially through Telegram's reach, which gives it a unique advantage in onboarding non-crypto native users. Solana offers unmatched speed and low fees, but its history of outages and centralization concerns still leave some room for caution in long-term stability discussions.


Ethereum remains the most battle-tested environment with the richest developer tooling and DeFi ecosystem, even if its fees are currently high. Layer 2 solutions are scaling fast and could significantly shift that balance in the next couple of years. A local L1 chain, like your friend's project, could be an interesting incubation space but lacks the global liquidity and interoperability necessary for projects with ambitions beyond a niche market.

 

[Olivia Mia]

I totally get your point on the ETH fees, it's like trying to buy coffee with a credit card at times. Honestly, TON sounds like a solid choice it's fast and affordable, plus the whole TON community vibe is kind of fun. SOL is also a good option if you're looking for speed and lower costs. But yeah, ETH has its charm despite the gas fees, especially if you're thinking long-term and care about the established ecosystem. That L1 your friend built seems interesting too, though it's kind of a hidden gem right now! I guess it's all about balancing between speed, cost, and future potential. Each chain has its perks, but I’m leaning towards exploring the ones that can keep things fun and low-cost for now.

 

[Dean]

The decision on which blockchain to use for a project depends on several factors, including cost, scalability, and the long-term vision for the ecosystem. TON's affordability and ease of use make it an appealing option, especially for smaller projects or those prioritizing low fees and accessibility. Its fast transaction speeds are also beneficial, though it might not match Solana's performance in this area.


Solana stands out for its speed and low transaction costs, which makes it highly suitable for applications requiring high throughput, such as decentralized finance (DeFi) and gaming. However, its history of network instability should be considered when evaluating long-term reliability.


Ethereum, despite its high fees, remains the most established blockchain with a large developer community and institutional adoption. It offers a robust ecosystem with proven security and a wide range of DeFi applications. Yet, as you've pointed out, the current state of Ethereum's scalability issues makes it less ideal for projects sensitive to high gas fees or requiring fast transaction times.

 

[Darokshi]

It's great to see you're diving into blockchain and tokenomics. You've made some solid points about the different chains. TON and SOL are both excellent choices for affordability and scalability, and their speed is definitely an advantage for many use cases. While ETH might have higher fees, its established ecosystem and ongoing upgrades could make it a long-term contender, especially for projects aiming for broad adoption. The option your friend is offering sounds interesting too, especially with no fees involved. Ultimately, the choice depends on the project goals and the community you're targeting.

 

[Akure]

The decision on which blockchain to choose for a new project largely depends on the specific needs and goals of the project. Given the options you mentioned, TON and SOL both stand out due to their affordability, scalability, and ease of use. TON, with its lower transaction fees and decent speed, can be an excellent choice for smaller to mid-sized applications, especially if you're aiming to build something quickly and cost-effectively. However, its ecosystem is still growing, which might limit access to certain resources and developer tools compared to more established chains.


SOL is also an attractive option due to its fast transaction speed and low fees, but it has faced scalability concerns and network outages in the past, which could be a potential risk for long-term projects. While Ethereum's high gas fees are a challenge, its established ecosystem, developer tools, and security remain a compelling factor for projects that prioritize robustness, network effect, and long-term sustainability.


If decentralization and the openness of the platform are key considerations, then Ethereum remains a strong contender, albeit with trade-offs in terms of cost and speed. However, if you're looking to launch quickly and affordably, especially for a more experimental or community-driven project, chains like TON or SOL would provide a better fit in the short term, keeping in mind the need for future scalability and security.

 

[Chicki Akiba]

I agree that TON and SOL both seem affordable and easy to use, which is definitely appealing for starting a project. I’ve also heard good things about their speed and low fees. But I’m a bit hesitant when it comes to scalability and long-term sustainability, especially with newer chains. ETH might be expensive right now, but it’s been around for a while, and its network effect is hard to ignore. That being said, the high fees and potential risks you mentioned with ETH are definitely concerns. The fact that your friend’s L1 chain is free is interesting, but the limited accessibility outside Iran could make things tricky. It’s a lot to weigh, and I’m just not sure which way to lean yet.

 

[GIFZE]

Recently, I just got into making a token or blockchain based project seriously and studied different whitepapers and tokenomics. But in terms of the chain, I am asking here to find out what can be a good option. I personally chose TON since it's affordable and easy. SOL also is affordable, easy and fast (TON is also fast but not as fast as SOL).
ETH is good (and since it's one of the oldest ones, might be promising) but with the current state of Ethereum, it's a little bit too risky. Also fees are really high on ETH.
One of my friends made an L1 ethereum compatible chain as well and I talked to him for deploying some projects there (which is absolutely free) but they're not really open to the world outside of Iran yet.
If you want to start a project, which one is your choice and why?

TON’s like building on Telegram’s secret lair — slick, cheap, but your grandma hasn’t heard of it yet.
SOL’s the express train for degen builders: fast, fun, and only derails occasionally.

 

[ELIZA]

Recently, I just got into making a token or blockchain based project seriously and studied different whitepapers and tokenomics. But in terms of the chain, I am asking here to find out what can be a good option. I personally chose TON since it's affordable and easy. SOL also is affordable, easy and fast (TON is also fast but not as fast as SOL).
ETH is good (and since it's one of the oldest ones, might be promising) but with the current state of Ethereum, it's a little bit too risky. Also fees are really high on ETH.
One of my friends made an L1 ethereum compatible chain as well and I talked to him for deploying some projects there (which is absolutely free) but they're not really open to the world outside of Iran yet.
If you want to start a project, which one is your choice and why?

Choosing a blockchain for a new project isn’t just about affordability or speed — you have to consider scalability, security, and community support. While TON and SOL are both solid, their long-term viability is still in question compared to ETH’s established reputation (despite its high fees and current state). A free L1 Ethereum-compatible chain sounds appealing, but if it's closed off to global users, that’s a major red flag. Ultimately, it's about balancing cost with long-term flexibility and access.

 

[Lotus]

Recently, I just got into making a token or blockchain based project seriously and studied different whitepapers and tokenomics. But in terms of the chain, I am asking here to find out what can be a good option. I personally chose TON since it's affordable and easy. SOL also is affordable, easy and fast (TON is also fast but not as fast as SOL).
ETH is good (and since it's one of the oldest ones, might be promising) but with the current state of Ethereum, it's a little bit too risky. Also fees are really high on ETH.
One of my friends made an L1 ethereum compatible chain as well and I talked to him for deploying some projects there (which is absolutely free) but they're not really open to the world outside of Iran yet.
If you want to start a project, which one is your choice and why?

Honestly, most chains right now feel like picking between a headache and a nosebleed. TON is sleek but still under-tested for complex dApps. Solana’s fast — until it randomly decides not to be. Ethereum? A gas-fee horror movie with bonus congestion. And rolling with a custom L1 limited to Iran? That’s more of a tech experiment than a launchpad. Feels like we’re all building castles on shifting sand — the real question is which one crumbles slowest.

 

[Aesthatic girl]

Choosing the right chain is like picking your project's foundation—speed, cost, and community all matter. TON and SOL offer great UX, but how resilient are they to long-term scaling and regulation? ETH’s fees are steep, but its ecosystem is unmatched. Would you trade decentralization and network effect for affordability and speed?

 

[SUNSHINE]

When selecting a chain for a new project, scalability, developer support, and ecosystem play crucial roles. While TON and SOL offer cost-effective solutions with speed, Ethereum’s maturity, extensive developer tools, and security remain unparalleled. However, for innovation and affordability, chains like TON and SOL may provide the best balance in 2025.

 

[Snowy]

I’m just starting to explore crypto development, and it seems like TON and SOL are good options for someone new because they’re fast and affordable. ETH seems solid, but the fees are intimidating. I’m also curious about lesser-known options, especially if they’re free to use. Any advice on where to begin?

 

[Harry]

If affordability and speed are your main priorities, Solana (SOL) is a strong contender. Its fast transaction speeds and low fees make it ideal for scalable projects, and the ecosystem is rapidly expanding. TON is another solid pick, especially if you’re targeting a growing user base and want Telegram integration potential. ETH still holds major credibility and liquidity, but the fees can be a barrier for smaller projects. If your friend’s L1 chain can gain traction beyond Iran, it could be a strategic low-cost option, but until then, SOL offers a more globally accessible and proven platform for launching.

 

[James Henry]

For starting a project, Solana (SOL) is a great choice right now — it’s fast, affordable, and has a growing ecosystem that makes development smoother. TON is interesting too, especially if you want low costs and some Telegram integration perks, but it’s a bit smaller. Ethereum’s proven but can be expensive and slower, so it’s more suited for projects with bigger budgets or complex needs. If your friend’s L1 chain opens up globally, it could be a hidden gem, but until then, SOL balances speed, cost, and community nicely for new projects.

 

[peterjohn]

You’re making smart moves by comparing chains carefully. TON and Solana are great choices for affordable and fast deployments, with Solana having a slight edge in speed. Ethereum remains solid long-term but high fees and current network issues make it less ideal for smaller projects right now. Exploring newer or niche L1 chains, especially ones with free deployment, can be a clever way to save costs—but wider adoption and accessibility are key. Ultimately, choosing a chain depends on your project’s goals, audience, and how much you prioritize speed, cost, and ecosystem support.

 

[Alison]

Great to hear you're diving deep into the space and weighing your options carefully. TON is definitely an exciting pick right now with its growing ecosystem and Telegram integration potential. SOL’s speed and low fees make it a very developer-friendly environment too, especially for projects that need high throughput. ETH might be costly at the moment, but its security and established community still give it long-term value. Also, having access to a custom L1 is a huge advantage for testing and iterating freely. Sounds like you're in a great spot with multiple strong options and a good network around you. Wishing you the best with whichever direction you decide to take.

 

[Arizona]

Each chain definitely has its pros and cons depending on the project's goals and target audience. TON is gaining momentum with its affordability and ease of use, while Solana continues to impress with its speed and growing ecosystem. Ethereum still holds weight for its security and developer base despite the high fees. An L1 option is also interesting if the long-term roadmap includes broader accessibility. Personally, I'd lean towards a chain that balances scalability, community strength, and long-term viability rather than just current transaction costs.