Hardware Wallets: Overrated for the Average User?

Smart contract wallets with programmable recovery, native multisig, session keys, and modular permissions are the path forward if we actually want mainstream adoption. Security needs to be invisible, not a separate device people forget in a drawer.
 
The fixation on hardware wallets as the default security standard overlooks the reality of user behavior and adoption barriers. Smart contract wallets with native multisig, social recovery, and modular security policies are the scalable path forward for self-custody. If we want mainstream adoption without compromising on security, we need infrastructure that meets users where they are, not where we wish they’d be.
 
Totally agree—it's time we stop gatekeeping with hardware wallets and start scaling adoption with smart contract wallets that are actually built for real people.
 
Hardware wallets are great—if you’re secretly a cyborg, but for the rest of us mere mortals, smart contract wallets with social recovery are the real crypto life hack.
 
Hardware wallets sound great in theory, but for most users they’re just expensive paperweights—maybe it’s time to stop preaching and start building what people actually use.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom