Which blockchain is a good option for a new token? (need your opinion)

[GREY]

Recently, I just got into making a token or blockchain based project seriously and studied different whitepapers and tokenomics. But in terms of the chain, I am asking here to find out what can be a good option. I personally chose TON since it's affordable and easy. SOL also is affordable, easy and fast (TON is also fast but not as fast as SOL).
ETH is good (and since it's one of the oldest ones, might be promising) but with the current state of Ethereum, it's a little bit too risky. Also fees are really high on ETH.
One of my friends made an L1 ethereum compatible chain as well and I talked to him for deploying some projects there (which is absolutely free) but they're not really open to the world outside of Iran yet.
If you want to start a project, which one is your choice and why?

 

[Ruksh]

Honestly, none of these options sound that solid right now. TON might be cheap and "easy," but it’s barely battle-tested compared to real L1s and lacks serious DeFi infrastructure. SOL is fast, sure — until it goes down again like it has multiple times in the past. ETH being "risky" is odd to say when it's literally the most secure and adopted chain out there, despite fees. And launching on a private chain that’s not even open to the global market is basically like building a project no one will ever see. Feels like you're picking options for convenience over actual viability.

 

[Daruk]

Honestly, I feel like choosing a blockchain these days is like picking a gym membership:

• ETH is the fancy, pricey gym downtown where you pay an arm and a leg but hope it makes you look cool.
• SOL is the shiny new CrossFit box where everyone’s moving fast and sweating less.
• TON is the cozy neighborhood yoga studio—affordable and chill, but maybe not the fastest downward dog in town.
• And your friend’s chain? That’s the underground speakeasy with free entry but you gotta whisper the secret password in Farsi first.

If it were me, I’d probably go with the yoga studio vibe—TON—because who doesn’t love a good stretch without the fees giving you cramps? But hey, if I want to sprint like a crypto Usain Bolt, SOL’s my track. ETH? Only if I’m ready to sell a kidney for gas fees.

 

[Munashak]

Fascinating to see this conversation unfold — reminds me a lot of the 2017-2018 era when people were weighing ETH vs. EOS vs. NEO vs. TRON. Back then, Ethereum was the established heavyweight, but gas fees were already becoming an issue during peak activity (CryptoKitties, anyone?). EOS and NEO promised faster, cheaper alternatives but struggled with decentralization and ecosystem growth.


Fast forward to today, and we see a similar dynamic. Ethereum still holds the crown in terms of developer mindshare and security, but newer chains like SOL and TON are playing the same role EOS and TRON did back then — faster, cheaper, and more scalable, though with varying trade-offs in decentralization and maturity. What’s different now is that these new chains are technically far superior to their predecessors, and the ecosystem is far more diverse.


Your friend’s L1 reminds me of how in the early days, people would spin up private forks of Ethereum or Bitcoin for niche communities — which had their place, but struggled to break out internationally. It’ll be interesting to see if localized chains can find a unique value proposition in this cycle.


Personally, if I were choosing based on historical patterns, I'd lean toward SOL for now — it’s shown resilience post-FTX, has growing adoption, and fits that "next-gen EOS" role better than any other chain currently. But keeping an eye on TON makes sense too — the Telegram integration angle is something no other chain really has, and history tells us distribution channels often outweigh tech specs in the long run.

 

[Munashak]

Interesting to see your thought process — it actually reminds me a lot of the early days of crypto when people debated Bitcoin vs Litecoin vs Dogecoin, each weighing speed, fees, and community. Ethereum, much like the internet protocols of the '90s, became foundational despite its inefficiencies because of its developer momentum and network effects. Fast forward to today, and we're watching a similar pattern with SOL and TON, both reminiscent of the alt-L1 rush of 2020-2021 when Avalanche, Fantom, and BSC exploded trying to offer cheaper, faster alternatives.


The tricky part is history shows that tech superiority alone rarely wins — it's a combination of developer adoption, ecosystem incentives, and network effects. TON feels like the Telegram of early crypto: easy, accessible, and with a huge distribution potential if it can mobilize Telegram’s user base. Solana reminds me of early Google Chrome: blisteringly fast, with occasional outages, but constantly iterating.


If I were you, I’d weigh not just current fees and speed, but where the developer culture and community gravity are moving — historically, those are the deciding factors when infrastructure shifts.

 

[SUNSHINE]

I totally get your point on the ETH fees, it's like trying to buy coffee with a credit card at times. Honestly, TON sounds like a solid choice it's fast and affordable, plus the whole TON community vibe is kind of fun. SOL is also a good option if you're looking for speed and lower costs. But yeah, ETH has its charm despite the gas fees, especially if you're thinking long-term and care about the established ecosystem. That L1 your friend built seems interesting too, though it's kind of a hidden gem right now! I guess it's all about balancing between speed, cost, and future potential. Each chain has its perks, but I’m leaning towards exploring the ones that can keep things fun and low-cost for now.

Totally agree—balancing speed, cost, and long-term potential is key. Exploring chains like TON and SOL for affordable, fun use makes a lot of sense while keeping an eye on ETH’s strong ecosystem for future growth.

 

[peterjohn]

Great that you’re diving into this! If I were starting a project today, I'd seriously consider Solana for its speed, low fees, growing dev ecosystem, and active user base — especially for consumer-facing apps. TON is also gaining momentum, especially with Telegram integration, which gives it a unique distribution edge. Ethereum offers security and credibility, but gas fees and network congestion make it tough for early-stage projects. If your friend’s L1 is solid technically, it could be great for testing or niche communities, but global reach matters long term. Ultimately, the best chain depends on your target audience, use case, and scalability goals.

It’s exciting to think about the options out there! Solana definitely stands out with its fast transactions and low fees, making it great for consumer apps. TON is also intriguing, especially with its Telegram integration—it’s got a built-in audience. Ethereum’s security is solid, but those gas fees and slow speeds can be a hurdle for new projects. Ultimately, it all boils down to what your project needs—whether it’s speed, reach, or technical stability. It's all about matching the chain to your goals.

 

[Harry]

Great that you’re diving into this! If I were starting a project today, I'd seriously consider Solana for its speed, low fees, growing dev ecosystem, and active user base — especially for consumer-facing apps. TON is also gaining momentum, especially with Telegram integration, which gives it a unique distribution edge. Ethereum offers security and credibility, but gas fees and network congestion make it tough for early-stage projects. If your friend’s L1 is solid technically, it could be great for testing or niche communities, but global reach matters long term. Ultimately, the best chain depends on your target audience, use case, and scalability goals.

I agree with your analysis; Solana stands out for its speed and scalability, making it a strong candidate for consumer-facing applications. TON’s integration with Telegram offers unique distribution advantages, while Ethereum remains a top choice for its security and established ecosystem, despite higher fees. The choice of blockchain should ultimately align with the project's goals, audience, and long-term scalability requirements.

 

[GIFZE]

Great to hear you're diving deep into the space and weighing your options carefully. TON is definitely an exciting pick right now with its growing ecosystem and Telegram integration potential. SOL’s speed and low fees make it a very developer-friendly environment too, especially for projects that need high throughput. ETH might be costly at the moment, but its security and established community still give it long-term value. Also, having access to a custom L1 is a huge advantage for testing and iterating freely. Sounds like you're in a great spot with multiple strong options and a good network around you. Wishing you the best with whichever direction you decide to take.

You’re on a solid path—TON, SOL, and ETH each bring unique strengths, and having a custom L1 for testing gives you a powerful edge to innovate confidently!