How Do You Value Generative Art NFTs in 2025? Still Just Vibes, or More?

Generative art has evolved a lot. It’s not just randomized traits anymore — it's now interactive, on-chain, and sometimes collaborative.

I’m wondering how people are thinking about valuation today. Is it still floor price and rarity? Or are people looking at provenance, algorithmic innovation, artist history, maybe even the mint experience?

Projects like Art Blocks pushed the standard, but there’s a whole wave of newer artists experimenting with AI, live mints, and modular visuals.

How do you personally value a generative art NFT now — art first, tech first, or a mix?

These days, it feels like a mix — strong aesthetics still matter, but tech and concept carry more weight than they used to. I look at the artist's intent, the uniqueness of the algorithm, and how the piece fits into a broader narrative or movement. Provenance and on-chain execution definitely add layers of value beyond just rarity.

Honestly, a lot of it still feels hype-driven — floor price masquerading as cultural value. While some collectors dig into provenance and tech, most just chase trends or big names. I respect the innovation, but real artistic or algorithmic depth often gets overshadowed by market noise.

For me, it’s a mix — if the piece hits visually and has an interesting algorithm or concept behind it, I’m in. Artist history and minting experience add flavor, but I still trust my gut on whether it feels meaningful. Floor price is just background noise unless I’m flipping.