Your point touches on a fundamental tension in both traditional and crypto markets. While risk management frameworks and probabilistic strategies can optimize exposure and reduce volatility, they don’t alter the structural advantage typically embedded in the system’s design. In many cases, these tools offer a sense of control rather than true mitigation of systemic risk. The house advantage isn't just a metaphor it's a reflection of asymmetric information, liquidity manipulation, and protocol mechanics that favor certain participants. Recognizing this doesn't negate the value of discipline and strategy, but it should frame expectations realistically.